PortfoliosLab logo
MSFL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and ^GSPC is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSFL:

-0.03

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

MSFL:

0.37

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

MSFL:

1.05

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

MSFL:

-0.00

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

MSFL:

-0.00

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

MSFL:

23.92%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

MSFL:

51.16%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

MSFL:

-47.70%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

MSFL:

-21.89%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.77% return.


MSFL

YTD

1.85%

1M

30.34%

6M

-0.08%

1Y

-2.55%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

7.44%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

10.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFL is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFL is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFL is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MSFL Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFL and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 20.67% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 6.82%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...