PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSFL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and ^GSPC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-34.15%
2.59%
MSFL
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSFL:

-0.64

^GSPC:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

MSFL:

-0.72

^GSPC:

0.47

Omega Ratio

MSFL:

0.91

^GSPC:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

MSFL:

-0.66

^GSPC:

0.24

Martin Ratio

MSFL:

-1.39

^GSPC:

1.08

Ulcer Index

MSFL:

22.53%

^GSPC:

4.25%

Daily Std Dev

MSFL:

48.92%

^GSPC:

19.00%

Max Drawdown

MSFL:

-47.70%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

MSFL:

-44.46%

^GSPC:

-14.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -10.18% return.


MSFL

YTD

-27.58%

1M

-11.65%

6M

-28.11%

1Y

-25.89%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-10.18%

1M

-6.71%

6M

-9.92%

1Y

6.35%

5Y*

13.40%

10Y*

9.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFL is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFL is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFL is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFL is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFL is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFL is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFL, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MSFL: -0.64
^GSPC: 0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFL, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MSFL: -0.72
^GSPC: 0.47
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFL, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
MSFL: 0.91
^GSPC: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFL, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MSFL: -0.66
^GSPC: 0.24
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFL, currently valued at -1.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MSFL: -1.39
^GSPC: 1.08

The current MSFL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFL and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50Mar 23Tue 25Thu 27Sat 29Mon 31Wed 02Fri 04Apr 06Tue 08Thu 10Sat 12Mon 14Wed 16
-0.64
0.24
MSFL
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-44.46%
-14.02%
MSFL
^GSPC

Volatility

MSFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 24.76% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 13.60%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
24.76%
13.60%
MSFL
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab